Or Pilsners…


Describing pilsner to an American is like describing pizza to a Chicagoan…or so I was going to start this article. That was until I started my research and realized a few things. First, what we poor American souls know as pilsner really isn’t, and second, I’m not a huge fan of what I’ll call ‘classic pilsner’. I won’t spend long hashing out what makes a beer a pilsner, as I covered most of it in ‘Or lagers…’.

At its heart, a pilsner is a lager beer that has its origins in the city of Pilsen, in what was originally Bohemia. The residents of Pilsen, having learned of the lagering process from travelers, decided to try the bottom-fermenting methods on their local brews. Classic pilsners (those not mass-produced in the states) have a strong hop flavor (hence my distaste for them). When beer making came to America, many brewers took to calling their stuff pilsner, even though they got rid of most of the hop flavor. Needless to say, the two pilsners are now step-children of the same process, but hardly siblings.

With the beer out of the way, I thought I’d mention a couple of articles I’ve seen around. It’s been a while since I did a news round-up! There was a study that came out recently that suggested that children who see R-rated movies are more likely do engage in under-aged drinking. So Freddy really is going to kill you, especially if you’re a kid with lenient parents. Of course, I must mention that the study isn’t suggesting that the movies are causing the drinking, not entirely anyway. The authors went on to imply that most of the effects were from lax parenting, but also cited exposure to adult themes (like drinking and drug use) as causes for becoming familiar with lady drink at a young age.

Now, it’s no secret that I stand with the group of people who advocate a drinking age of 18. The arguments of joining the armed forces, voting, entering into contracts, and the like indicate to me an illogical double standard in keeping adults from imbibing. There’s also the notion that parents are relying more and more on the government to raise their children, which bugs me too. I did read about a law in Georgia (I think) which explicitly says that parents can serve alcohol to their underage kids at home. Odd to feel hope coming out of Georgia.

I suppose I’ve probably done enough social commentary for now, and probably insulted a few Georgians in the process. No insult intended, really, I have friends out there (or at least I *used* to).

Caw!

  1. #1 by George Shaw on May 3, 2010 - 1:27 pm

    I really enjoy and old fashioned pilsner, but they are almost impossible to find. Of course, I really enjoy a good IPA, so you know that I like the strong hop effect in my beers and ales. Of course, I think that ruining beer and ale so that people that don’t really like beer or ale can drink them is an almost capital offence.

  2. #2 by George Shaw on May 3, 2010 - 1:33 pm

    There is a joke about a beer brewers’ convention. During the break the CEO of Budweiser went in and ordered a Bud Lite, the CEO of Coors went in and ordered a Coors Lite, and the CEO of Millers went in and ordered a Millers Lite. The CEO of Okanagen Springs went in, looked around, and ordered a diet cola. The others all said, “Hey, what are you doing?” He said, “Well, I figured if you guys weren’t going to drink beer, I wouldn’t either.”

  3. #3 by The Raven on May 3, 2010 - 1:41 pm

    George,

    I agree with you wholeheartedly. I’ve often bemoaned the tendency to usurp the name and character of a beverage and apply it to a derivative product that has been manufactured to appeal to a wider audience. Case in point: the Martini. If you have to modify the name with ‘vodka’, it’s not really a martini. I join in your quest to call a spade a spade. The derivative products have their right to exist (and to be enjoyed) but calling pilsners does seem to take away from a prouder historical tradition.

    Thanks for reading!

Comments are closed.